----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:34 PM
Subject: RE: Which is quicker
> cfswitch is both quicker and more elegant. The only downside is that it
> doesn't handle dynamic values.
That's funny. I find CFSWITCH to be far from elegant. Mostly due to CF's
tag-based nature. You end up with a lot more crap in your code where you're
closing each CFCASE block. I think a CFIF statement is usually a lot more
readable as well as being more flexible.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- RE: Which is quicker Barney Boisvert
- Re: Which is quicker Bryan Stevenson
- RE: Which is quicker Barney Boisvert
- Cookie handling in older versions? Nick Baker
- RE: Which is quicker Matthew Walker
- RE: Which is quicker Tom Kitta
- RE: Which is quicker Barney Boisvert
- RE: Which is quicker Tom Kitta
- RE: Which is quicker Philip Arnold
- RE: Which is quicker Tom Kitta
- Re:Which is quicker Jim McAtee
- Re:Which is quicker Claudia Hoag
- RE: Which is quicker Matthew Walker
- Re: Which is quicker Jim Campbell
- RE: Which is quicker Tom Kitta
- RE: Which is quicker Matthew Walker
- RE: Which is quicker Matthew Walker
- RE: Which is quicker Matthew Walker
- RE: Which is quicker Barney Boisvert
- RE: Which is quicker Tom Kitta
- RE: Which is quicker Bill Grover