----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 3:34 PM
Subject: RE: Which is quicker

> cfswitch is both quicker and more elegant. The only downside is that it
> doesn't handle dynamic values.

That's funny.  I find CFSWITCH to be far from elegant.  Mostly due to CF's
tag-based nature.  You end up with a lot more crap in your code where you're
closing each CFCASE block.  I think a CFIF statement is usually a lot more
readable as well as being more flexible.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to