On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:26:00 -0800, in cf-talk you wrote:
>What do you need it for anyway? Unlike any of the other scopes, all the
>variables in the 'var' scope have to be explicitly defined by you with 'var'
>statements, so there should never be a need for dynamic evaluation of on.
You're right: There is an easy way to avoid 'var' scope evaluation
(though not with the scope-as-struct notation).
Thanks,
Jamie
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- Scope name of method's local scope? Jamie Jackson
- RE: Scope name of method's local scope? Barney Boisvert
- Re: Scope name of method's local scope? Jamie Jackson
- RE: Scope name of method's local scop... Barney Boisvert
- RE: Scope name of method's local ... Jamie Jackson
- RE: Scope name of method's local scope? DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT)
- RE: Scope name of method's local scope? Barney Boisvert
- RE: Scope name of method's local scope? Dave Watts