a production server (not necessarily against CF4.5 (or CF5) and MX no the
same box). His suggestion echos MM's own recommendations against doing so.
MX's standalone server was provided to allow people to test/migrate their
data from CF5 to MX on a single box. It wasn't intended to be robust enough
to be used as a production server.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Chiverton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: CFMX and CF5 on same server
> On Wednesday 25 Feb 2004 16:22 pm, Samuel R. Neff wrote:
> > If you run them on separate ports it will work fine, but I wouldn't
suggest
> > it for a production server.
>
> Why not ?
> We run legacy CF4.5 and MX6.1 on the same box.
> Different ports, obviously, but we proxy them both through a common Apache
to
> make them appear to be the same URL.
>
> --
> Tom Chiverton
> Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
>
> Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> BlueFinger Limited
> Underwood Business Park
> Wookey Hole Road, WELLS. BA5 1AF
> Tel: +44 (0)1749 834900
> Fax: +44 (0)1749 834901
> web: www.bluefinger.com
> Company Reg No: 4209395 Registered Office: 2 Temple Back East, Temple
> Quay, BRISTOL. BS1 6EG.
> *** This E-mail contains confidential information for the addressee
> only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
> immediately. You should not use, disclose, distribute or copy this
> communication if received in error. No binding contract will result from
> this e-mail until such time as a written document is signed on behalf of
> the company. BlueFinger Limited cannot accept responsibility for the
> completeness or accuracy of this message as it has been transmitted over
> public networks.***
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
