Mark, would you like to share that movie, it sounds interesting.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hugo Ahlenius E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project Officer Phone: +46 8 230460
UNEP GRID-Arendal Fax: +46 8 230441
Stockholm Office Mobile: +46 733 467111
WWW: http://www.grida.no
-------------------------------------------------------------
---- Original Message ----
From: "Mark A. Kruger - CFG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 22:50
Subject: RE: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages
| Nick,
|
| I've found cf flush to be useful when you are serving up long tabular
| report data. If you are going to output several hundred rows,
| cfflush can help a lot. One approach I've used that works great for
| intranet sites where the browser is a known item is a combination of
| a status bar, _javascript_ and cfflush. I create a flash movie that
| has a status bar with frames from 1 to 100 (1 being an "empty" bar
| and 100 being "filled") based on a variable I can set using the
| "SetVariable( )" function in _javascript_. Then, as I'm outputting data
| I increment that variable using cfflush and _javascript_.
|
| For example, using MOD 100 (or whatever threshold makessense to you)
| and currrent row I could run a calculation that gives me the percent
| commplete of the output. let's say 13 percent at row 200. Then, I
| would write this: (<script>movie.SetVariable(13,"13%");</script>) ..
| the first item is the frame number I want the movie to go to and
| stop, the second variable is a label. I use <cfflush> to send it to
| the html page where it is run "inline" immediately. The result is a
| nice looking status bar that climbs incrementally at the top of the
| report and lets the user know that data is being sent to the browser
| and to please be patient. This approach can be useful for things like
| data upload tools where user uploads a spreadsheet or database that
| is subsequently inserted into a table or appended to a file. That's
| my 0.02.
|
| -Mark
|
|
|
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Nick Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 3:25 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages
|
|
| CF 4.5.1 and 5.0
|
| Any opinions on the use of CFFLUSH? From my understanding you have
| to deal with some tradeoff, e.g., it imposes several restrictions
| on the use of other tags and the method of client variable storage.
| The upside is not so clear, other than CFFLUSH help avoid time outs
| on slow Web sites?
|
| Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages Nick Baker
- RE: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages Barney Boisvert
- RE: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages Mark A. Kruger - CFG
- RE: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages Hugo Ahlenius
- RE: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages Mark A. Kruger - CFG
- RE: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages Philip Arnold
- Re: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages Hugo Ahlenius
- RE: CFFLUSH Advantages / Disadvantages Tom Jordahl
- catching session timeouts David Ashworth