I've only found one issue and it's so rare that you'll probably never see
it. It involves 'blank' matches and subexpressions. There's a full
explanation of it on the front of HoF (down mid page or so). Other than
that, CFMX RegEx are a huge leap over CF 5 RegEx. Still not perfect, but
really good.
> On the CF Server list I mention that we've not yet migrated from CF5 to
CFMX
> and asked if there are any code changes necessary. I recall reading on
this
> list that the regex language has changed in CFMX from POSIX compliant to a
> more Perl-like style. Does this mean that old code needs to be rewritten,
or
> is the new implementation backward compatible?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- CFMX Regexes Jim McAtee
- Michael Dinowitz