> I made two attempt to use WDDX in my life and the two times
> it was a lamentable failure.
> Recently, I discoverd the problem that <CFWDDX will lower
> case the variable names in a JS structure, which is
> catastrophic since _javascript_ is case sensitive.
> I managed to get a result using exclusively lower case
> variables names, but now I see that the record wont fit in a
> memo field in Access because it is larger than 64 k! 64k for
> just a couple of tables containing a couple of variables,
> cmon, WDDX is much too verbose...

Come on now - is it really fair to blame WDDX because of a limitation in
Access? As it stands - according to Google, the 64k limit only exists when
using Access directly. Via SQL, you should have 1 gig of space.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to