> I made two attempt to use WDDX in my life and the two times
> it was a lamentable failure.
> Recently, I discoverd the problem that <CFWDDX will lower
> case the variable names in a JS structure, which is
> catastrophic since _javascript_ is case sensitive.
> I managed to get a result using exclusively lower case
> variables names, but now I see that the record wont fit in a
> memo field in Access because it is larger than 64 k! 64k for
> just a couple of tables containing a couple of variables,
> cmon, WDDX is much too verbose...
Come on now - is it really fair to blame WDDX because of a limitation in
Access? As it stands - according to Google, the 64k limit only exists when
using Access directly. Via SQL, you should have 1 gig of space.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- Using CFC to dynamically populate a select using javascr... Craig Earls
- Re: Using CFC to dynamically populate a select usin... Claude Schneegans
- Re: Using CFC to dynamically populate a select ... Raymond Camden
- Re: Using CFC to dynamically populate a sel... Dick Applebaum