On Mar 29, 2004, at 6:45 PM, Danielle Romain wrote:
> Actually, I think MM is right not to have created a "full" server
> product with Flex. It seems that their strategy is to incorporate
> Flex functionality into the next version of CF. But I think it would
> have been an equally poor choice to lock Flex with ColdFusion
> development. Macromedia has done a good job in making products like
> Flash, Dreamweaver, et al., applicable to developers using CF, .NET,
> PHP or whatever.
>
> I think it's safe to assume that current Flash RIAs are sitting on
> top of a separate web server (be it CF, or something else). So, the
> frustration I among developers I have heard from today is not in Flex
> being a separate server, but its price.
>
> I get the impression that developers see the need and usefulness of a
> product like Flex today, but don't want to wait for Blackstone and
> don't have an enterprise budget to work with. I am one of them.
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
