I think most people are using FB3 because it's been around longer. If I
were starting from scratch I'd use FB4 or Mach-II.
--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 15, 2004, at 11:15 PM, Johnny Le wrote:
> Thank you, Cameron. Which version of Fusebox do you think I should
> use? I know it has fusebox 3, 4, and Mach-II, but most people seem to
> use fusebox 3. Is fusebox 4 and Mach-II harder to use?
>
> Johnny
>
>> Johnny,
>>
>> Fusebox is just a buncha CF code. You should be able to use any
>> hosting
>> service with it.
>>
>> -Cameron
>>
>> -----------------
>> Cameron Childress
>> Sumo Consulting Inc
>> http://www.sumoc.com
>> ---
>> land: 858.509.3098
>> cell: 678.637.5072
>> aim: cameroncf
>> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Johnny Le [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 7:04 PM
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: Fusebox on a web hosting service?
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to use fusebox for my web site, but can use any web hosting
>> service
>> for it? Or do I have to carefully choose the ones that support
>> fusebox? I
>> know that you have to download a core file before you can use it. So
>> can we
>> put the core file anywhere or it has to be at a specific location
>> that I
>> would not be able to do it if the web hosting service doesn't support
>> it?
>>
>> Johnny
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- Fusebox on a web hosting service? Johnny Le
- RE: Fusebox on a web hosting service? Cameron Childress
- Re: Fusebox on a web hosting service? Johnny Le
- RE: Fusebox on a web hosting service? Michael T. Tangorre
- Re: Fusebox on a web hosting service? Jeff Langevin
- RE: Fusebox on a web hosting service? Howard Fore
- RE: Fusebox on a web hosting service? Tangorre, Michael