If the IDE supported FTP and the Access database was local during
development they would be set then right?

-Matt

On Jun 16, 2004, at 11:21 AM, Paul Kenney wrote:

> Just think of those poor developers that are forced to work off of
> shared
>  hosting accounts with no WebDav, a single FTP account, an Access
> database
>  and no RDS access.  Oh, the humanity!  They could all be saved!
>
>  Paul Kenney
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  916-212-4359
>
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Paul Kenney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:17 AM
>  > To: CF-Talk
>  > Subject: RE: RDS support (was Re: CFEclipse release - beta
>  >
>  >
>  > Matt,
>  >
>  > I know that there are other ways of getting to all this
>  > information, but not
>  > everyone works (or would like to work) in the same manner.
>  > Not everyone has
>  > WebDav and CVS installed.  Not everyone the flexibility to have the
> DB
>  > installed on their own machine for development.  Not everyone
>  > has access to
>  > the CFC browser--since it uses the much protected RDS
>  > password.  Wouldn't it
>  > just be helpful if the IDE took care of all this for you, and
>  > did it well?
>  > Come on Matt, wouldn't it?
>  >
>  > Paul Kenney
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > 916-212-4359
>  >
>  > > -----Original Message-----
>  > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:04 AM
>  > > To: CF-Talk
>  > > Subject: Re: RDS support (was Re: CFEclipse release - beta
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > I guess I don't understand. Why would you have a service that
> wraps
>  > > access to your database on your web server when you can just go
>  > > directly to the database? Again, we aren't talking
>  > production, so the
>  > > database might even be on the same machine as the web server.
>  > >
>  > > Personally, the way I have things setup is as follows. I do all my
>  > > development on my laptop, which has CF and a DB on it. I
>  > > interact with
>  > > CF through the file system and with the database through
>  > JDBC. Source
>  > > code is managed with CVS and deployed into production from
>  > > CVS directly
>  > > based on tags. With that setup, RDS provides no benefits for me.
>  > >
>  > > Now I know that some people use hosting accounts where they
>  > can't use
>  > > CVS for deployments. In that regard, it seems WebDav and FTP
>  > > work just
>  > > fine.
>  > >
>  > > -Matt
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > On Jun 16, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Paul Kenney wrote:
>  > >
>  > > > OK, but consolidated into one single service available on
>  > > the server.
>  > > >
>  > > >  Paul Kenney
>  > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > >  916-212-4359
>  > > >
>  > > >  > -----Original Message-----
>  > > >  > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > > >  > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:22 AM
>  > > >  > To: CF-Talk
>  > > >  > Subject: Re: RDS support (was Re: CFEclipse release - beta
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  > > 1. User-level authentication/authorization
>  > > >  > WebDav
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  > >  2. Database info
>  > > >  > JDBC
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  > >  3. Component info
>  > > >  > Your IDE.
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  > -Matt
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >  >
>  > > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to