> While we are on the subject I have noticed recently that more
> and ore people are joining tables using the...
>
> FROM table1 x JOIN table2 y ON x.ID = y.ID
>
> And I am wondering if there is a reason for this. Sure I use
> this syntax for my outer joins but inner joins I still do the
> old fashioned way in the where clause, for example
>
> FROM table1 x, table2 y
> WHERE x.ID = y.ID
>
> This has the added benefit of taking the place of the 'WHERE
> 0=0' line we recently discussed. What are the benefits of
> one form of inner join over the other or is it just today's
> SQL fashion trend?
It's hardly a fashion trend - it's the law (ANSI SQL 92 specification). Most
modern databases support explicit JOINs.
It provides two benefits. Jochem mentioned that it separates filters from
join conditions. As a byproduct of this, it prevents unintentional Cartesian
products or cross joins, which can easily happen when you perform joins in a
WHERE clause.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) rob.stokes
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) James Smith
- Re: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) Jochem van Dieten
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query... James Smith
- Re: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search q... Jochem van Dieten
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) Joe Rinehart
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) Joe Rinehart
- Re: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) Philip Arnold
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) James Smith
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) Dave Watts
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) Dave Watts
- RE: SQL query style (WAS: SQL search query) Robert Orlini