thumb we always use addtoken="no" in our cflocation tags.
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>
> only issue we really saw was the change in cflocation....addtoken
defaults to yes now.
>
> Doug
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:04 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Upgrading to CFMX
>
>
> flawless for us so far.
>
> 3 servers, and multiple dev boxes, all good :)
>
> but certainly install on a dev box, run the code analyzer, fix, and
test
> again then I'd go production from there.
>
> tw
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:01 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Upgrading to CFMX
>
> You'll run into a few oddities here and there that you'll have to find
> through testing.
>
> Be sure to use the code analyzer in cf admin.
>
> If you use cfform, you'll need to account for that.
>
> One app on multiple OSes? Sounds fun!
>
> -Calvin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris McGrath
> Date: 6/23/04 12:17 pm
> To: CF-Talk
> Subj: Upgrading to CFMX
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have been charged with upgrading a CRM application built using CF
> 5.0. Currently we are looking at upgrading 15 web servers (a mix of
Win
> 2k and Win 2003).
>
> My question is what are some experiences you had in doing an upgrade
> from 5.0 to MX?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
> _____
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
