>
> I think what he means is CF to Word Document. Correct me if I'm
> wrong. There has been talk about that but only with making them an rtf
> document, which is supported by Word.
Doc is an ole-based pain. I once wrote a cfx that could extract out the pure
text of a word doc. doc is tightly coupled to windows and poorly documented.
It is best just to use rtf. Less hassle.
--min
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
