It's not that big a deal Doug. I've done the same thing because I don't
WANT people seeing blah.cfm. As a matter of fact I usually create a new
extension every time. If my client is BMW, I'll make all the files into
index.bmw or home.bmw or whatever. They're actually cfm files, but I
just want the extensions to appear differently.
_____
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6
Why on earth would you place the extra load on the server by making CF
handle
htm files? I have seen this once before when a client wanted that set
up on a
shared server. IIS 6.0 handles htm files so much easier and with a lot
less
CPU load.
Doug
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeremy Bunton
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:41 PM
Subject: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6
Hello,
I am building a dev/test box with 2003 server and iis 6
running 6.1. The install seemed to go fine. I am moving
some sites over to the new machine and one has the .htm
extension mapped to be processed by CF. I did this on 2000
server but ccan't recall what i did and am sure it is
deifferent now. I think I had to add an isapi mapping and
change an xml file. What is that procedure on 2003 and i
recall someone mentioning a nasty cache problem on 2003
that also requires a change in an xml file to fix. ANy help
would be appreciated. THanks a lot
Jeremy
_____
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- RE: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6 Dave Watts
- Re: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6 Ken Ferguson
- Re: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6 Jeremy Bunton
- Re: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6 Doug White
- Re: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6 Tony Weeg