It's not that big a deal Doug. I've done the same thing because I don't
WANT people seeing blah.cfm. As a matter of fact I usually create a new
extension every time. If my client is BMW, I'll make all the files into
index.bmw or home.bmw or whatever. They're actually cfm files, but I
just want the extensions to appear differently.

  _____  

From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6

Why on earth would you place the extra load on the server by making CF
handle
htm files?   I have seen this once before when a client wanted that set
up on a
shared server.   IIS 6.0 handles htm files so much easier and with a lot
less
CPU load.

Doug

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Jeremy Bunton
  To: CF-Talk
  Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:41 PM
  Subject: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6

  Hello,

  I am building a dev/test box with 2003 server and iis 6
  running 6.1. The install seemed to go fine. I am moving
  some sites over to the new machine and one has the .htm
  extension mapped to be processed by CF. I did this on 2000
  server but ccan't recall what i did and am sure it is
  deifferent now. I think I had to add an isapi mapping and
  change an xml file. What is that procedure on 2003 and i
  recall someone mentioning a nasty cache problem on 2003
  that also requires a change in an xml file to fix. ANy help
  would be appreciated. THanks a lot

  Jeremy

  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to