scope. My understanding is that Blackstone will support this as well.
-Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Dawson, Michael
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:42 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Session-Based CFC Usage Across Clusters
>
> I have read that session-based CFCs cannot be clustered (according to a
> livedoc comment).
>
> Because of this, how many people have decided to stick with using
> session-based CFCs rather than deal with the issues related to
> clustering?
>
> If you decided to focus on clustering and not use session-bases CFCs,
> how did you implement your processes?
>
> I have been asked to support Windows 2003 Network Load Balancing, which
> CFMX 6.1 would support, however, I have my CFCs sitting in the session
> scope. I thought that an alternative would be to store a session-based
> structure that would hold all the data I would normally store in my CFC
> instance. Then, I would just call application-based functions that
> would normally be in the CFC instance as well.
>
> My fear is that I would then need to lock each call to the
> appliation-scope functions since many browser sessions could get
> mixed-up data.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Thanks
>
> M!chael A. Dawson
> Manager, Programming and Software Development
> Office of Technology Services
> University of Evansville
> 1800 Lincoln Avenue
> Evansville, IN 47722
> 812-479-2581
>
> If you can read this, you are umop apisdn.
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
