I was using 4.0 for quite a while during it's beta run. It was rock
solid. Can't speak for 4.1, as I haven't used it at all, but the
MySQL guys seem to do it right. I wouldn't use it for a mission
critical app, but for internal stuff like a bug tracker, I'd go for
it. Especially if I knew I was probably going to be using it for
production systems in the future, just to have a chance to play with
it beforehand.
cheers,
barneyb
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:47:02 -0400, Damien McKenna
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How reliable is MySQL 4.1? I know its flagged as beta but would it be
> safe to use for a small task, e.g. a bug tracker?
> --
> Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The Limu Company - http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014
> "Nothing endures but change." - Heraclitus
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- OT: MySQL 4.1 reliability? Damien McKenna
- UNIX linefeeds... why? Barney Boisvert
- UNIX linefeeds... why? Charlie Griefer
- Re: UNIX linefeeds... why? Jochem van Dieten
- Re: UNIX linefeeds... why? Charlie Griefer
- Re: UNIX linefeeds... why? Sean Corfield
- Re: UNIX linefeeds... why? Claude Schneegans
- Re: UNIX linefeeds... why? Sean Corfield
- Re: UNIX linefeeds... why? Dick Applebaum
- Re: UNIX linefeeds... why? Ray Champagne
- Re: UNIX linefeeds... why? Dick Applebaum