I think he meant they were both going to sit behind the one switch.

By the way, you can virtually "split" a Cisco switch such that it load
balances your web server farm separately from your ColdFusion server farm
running in distributed mode.  Great for balancing resources on sites that
weigh more heavily toward web service or toward application service, and you
want to grow the hardware each side of your server farm accordingly.

Respectfully,

Adam Phillip Churvis
Member of Team Macromedia

Advanced Intensive Training:
* C# & ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers
* ColdFusion MX Master Class
* Advanced Development with CFMX and SQL Server 2000
http://www.ColdFusionTraining.com

Download CommerceBlocks V2.1 and LoRCAT from
http://www.ProductivityEnhancement.com

The ColdFusion MX Bible is in bookstores now!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark A Kruger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX 6.1 and cisco load balance

> well... I'm not sure how good it is going to do you if one is behind the
> load balancer and 1 is in front.  In the words of Mr. Miagi - ....it takes
2
> to tango. ... maybe it was boggie... can't remember.
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 2:43 PM
>   To: CF-Talk
>   Subject: CFMX 6.1 and cisco load balance
>
>
>   Ok, anyone got some pointers for setting this up?  I've been googling
>   around and looking at macr for abit.  So much is about CF5 and
>   clustercats.  ClusterCats still around?  Should it be used?  Have 2
>   webservers going to sit them behind one of those fance cisco load
>   balancers.
>
>   --
>   Douglas Knudsen
>   http://www.cubicleman.com
>   this is my signature, like it?
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to