> > MySQL is out of the question for sensitive information. MySQL
> > is missing to much functionality to maintain data integrity
> > on db level.
>
> Really. Like what?
I don't follow MySQL development too closely, so this may have been
addressed by now, but the versions I looked at didn't ensure declarative
referential integrity in many cases. I suspect this is what Micha is
referring to. Jochem would be the go-to guy for a full explanation, I'm
sure!
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
phone: 202-797-5496
fax: 202-797-5444
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus out there?) Micha Schopman
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus out th... Andrew Dixon
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus out th... Scott Stroz
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus ou... Andy Allan
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security guru... Jochem van Dieten
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security ... Andy Allan
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus out th... Cutter
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus ou... Paul Hastings
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus out th... Dave Watts
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus out th... Dave Watts
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus out th... Micha Schopman
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus ou... Andrew Dixon
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security guru... Jochem van Dieten
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security ... Damien McKenna
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus ou... Mark A Kruger
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security guru... Scott Stroz
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security ... Andrew Dixon
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Secu... Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security ... Marlon Moyer