Jean-Marc
Douglas Knudsen wrote:
>go with verity. Which will be faster? Probably depends on volume of
>data really. Which is more robust out of the box? Verity.
>
>Doug
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Andrew Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:23:07 +0100
>Subject: Re: Verity or a classic search?
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Personally I would use a verity search as you get a summary and score
>returned so you can create a results output similar to Google which
>most people are now fimilar with.
>
>Andrew.
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Jean Marc Bottin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:12:25 +0200
>Subject: Verity or a classic search?
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Hi guys,
>
>I looking for some advice. I have a DB with a table book which contains
>a field "keywords". This field will be fill in with word separated by
>comma like (IT, Computer, Coldfusion, CFML, Web). This field can be
>updated and key words can be added or deleted.
>
>The user will use an UI with a search form where the search criterias
>could be: author, title and keywords for instance. The keyword field
>will be a multiple select menu.
>
>My question is to know which one will be the faster to process for the
>application. A verity collection or a classic SQL query which will
>contain the specific keywords?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jean-Marc
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
