> balanced point... altho you may want to cache that 43 second query
> somehow so that it isn't that long the next time round :)
Indeed. I was mainly using such a big number for contrast. In general, a
43-second process had darn well better return me a golden egg.
:)
Matthieu
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
