At 04:56 PM 11/4/2004, you wrote: >Mach-IV? > >Dan Yeah. It's twice as fast as Mach-II, and roughly 4 times as fast as FuseBox 4.
FuseBox uses the FuseDocs standard, which slows it down a little. With Mach-IV, you get true MVC coding, together with "smart" caching that is done through nested structs. I don't have the site handy, but do a search for "Mach 4 structs qry" on Google and you'll find it. -- A >On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 14:23:40 -0500, Alexander Sherwood ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> At 01:39 PM 11/4/2004, you wrote: >> >Count me in!!! >> >> We switched to Mach-IV. >> >> It's like Mach-II, only twice as fast and a better, more robust plugin architecture. >> >> It uses the better, more streamline XSLT2.0 W3C standard. >> >> -- >> A >> >> >On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 12:51:08 -0400, Kwang Suh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> If people really want it, I'm going to write a very long, detailed tutorial on >> >> using Mach-II sometime in December. I wasn't too satified with the amount and >> >> quality of documentation out there. >> >> >> >> >I'm curious who is using Mach-II... >> >> > >> >> >Documentation and examples seems to be very minimal. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:183501 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
