I only feel it's my duty to mention that you can still develop CF Apps in a timely menner without the use of FB or MACH II that do utilize proper OO techniques... and that perform better, as well. I don't want to open a can of worms here, but thought I'd point it out.
~Simon Simon Horwith Member of Team Macromedia Macromedia Certified Master Instructor Editor-in-Chief, ColdFusion Developers Journal Blog - http://www.horwith.com Brian Kotek wrote: >It might help to note that many of the same principles of OO >development with CFCs can be applied using Fusebox 4 as well as >Mach-II. People are starting to build fully abstracted object models >with CFCs. When they're built correctly, you can take that object >model and use it with Mach-II or Fusebox 4 (or both) without much >effort. The only thing that changes is the "bridge" between the >framework and the object model. In Mach-II, this bridge is the >Listener. In Fusebox, it is often a set of application-scoped manager >CFCs that take calls from the framework and feed them to your business >model CFCs. > >I guess the point is, you can start honing your OO skills within >Fusebox 4 and then whenever you feel like it give Mach-II a try. > > >On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:32:40 -0400, Ali Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Thanks Sean, >>And thanks to everyone else that has posted in this thread. >> >>I really like Fusebox 4, and have been able to start converting my apps to >>that. Now that I have the hang of that, I am able to at least read the >>Mach-II code and understand it a little better. >> >>Thanks for all the links and info you posted, it's all beginning to make a >>lot more sense now. I think I might check out the books you recommend on >>your site. >> >>Ali >> >> >> >> >>>On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:56:43 -0400, Ali Awan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I'm still pretty fuzzy on the whole thing. I still can't figure out >>>> >>>> >>>how to define listeners and events, in a way that makes sense for the >>>applications I write and work on. >>> >>>Perhaps the story of my migration from FB3 to Mach II will help you? >>> >>>http://www.corfield.org/index.cfm?event=machiirewrite >>> >>> >>> >>>>For now I'll probably stick to Fusebox 4, and troll the lists you >>>> >>>> >>>mentioned to see if I get struck by lightning and it all makes sense >>>to me :) >>> >>>Well, that's certainly a good approach if you're not really >>>comfortable with the whole OO thing... and I think Fusebox 4.1 is a >>>great framework to use, BTW. >>>-- >>>Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ >>>Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ >>>Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme >>>Got Gmail? -- I have 1 invite >>> >>>"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." >>>-- Margaret >>> >>> >>Atwood >> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185529 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
