>>"object-oriented methodology" doesn't guarantee you won't have obtuse and unmaintainable code.
Absolutely. The problem is that many "programmers" wont learn programming, then just learn how to use a "framework" and they beleive they know programming, just because they "use a framework" the result is actually "spaghetti framework" ;-) >>Many well-written web applications are procedural, rather than object-oriented, and CF is the ideal language for writing web applications if you're satisfied with procedural programming. I'm not so sure it's the ideal language for OO web programming. Exact, there is nothing more procedural than a Web application: There is ONE request to a server for a page from a user, and ONE answer from the server to the user. Now, if some want absolutely to see Objects or even EVENTS there, well good for them if it can make them happy ;-) But the fact is that any CF page is nothing but ONE call to a procedure, and a "CF application" is nothing else than a bunch of pages. -- _______________________________________ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185622 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
