> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 17:13:35 -0500, S. Isaac Dealey > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So is the onTap framework (free that is) -- which does >> most of what >> PLUM does and some things PLUM doesn't do... it doesn't >> have an IDE... >> and in looking at the feature list for PLUM it seemed to >> me like many >> of features mentioned that aren't currently core in the >> onTap >> framework could be implemented in the onTap framework in >> a matter of >> minutes. I'll admit I haven't looked at PLUM very deeply, >> I've just >> skimmed the feature list, etc. but it wasn't a >> jaw-dropper for me. >>
> Some bold assertions. When you install it and properly > evaluate it, > maybe only then would it be appropraite for you to comment > on it, and > does not necessarily have to be in contrast with your > tool. > Dan Why is it ever inappropriate to comment on something you've read Dan? ... I went to the site, I read some information about PLUM, I commented on what I read, and I _said_ I was commenting on what I read. I don't see anything wrong with that. I may not have said it in the most politically correct manner, but ... in all honesty, get over yourself. s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1 http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1 http://www.fusiontap.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:187970 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
