Did you try to load your CFCs into the session scope for every session. You can easily eat the memory...
Murat. > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 6:59 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Number of functions in a CFC? > > The poor man's way. I specify a number of objects to load, pull up > task manager, then monitor the difference. I've found that even my > cfcs with alot of functions have a very _very_ small RAM imprint. > > -Adam > > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:50:37 -0500, Burns, John D > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm using Firefox because M$ is evil...just kidding Adam. I'm not > > really currently doing monitoring on this because I'm not quite sure > > how. That's one of my concerns. The other reason I asked > the question > > is because I am using a lot of these functions over and over and I'm > > caching the CFC in the application scope. The thing I'm > wondering is if > > I cache 1 CFC in the application scope with 100 functions > in it will it > > use more/less memory and will it perform better/worse than > caching 20 > > different CFCs in the application scope and call each separately. > > Obviously, these numbers are just examples and I don't plan > on having 1 > > CFC with 100 functions, but I'm just looking for > statistics/measurements > > on which is a better practice. How are you testing memory > usage of CFCs > > (if at all)? > > > > John Burns > > Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer > > AI-ES Aeronautics, Web Developer > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:44 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: Number of functions in a CFC? > > > > On the topic, how is everyone testing memory usage of CFCs? > > > > -Adam > > > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:37:39 -0500, Jim Davis > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I always feel that CFC should encompass a single, well-defined > > concept. > > > > > > Put as many functions in the CFC as you need to address > the needs of > > > that concept, but keep an eye on creep. Usually (but not > always) a > > > large number of functions in a CFC indicates that you may > have set the > > > > > concept too broadly and should consider multiple CFCs. > > > > > > There isn't a specific number (or range of numbers or > size) that this > > > happens at and it's different every time. A CFC might > start overreach > > > > > its scope and indicate the need for a new CFC after the > 30th function, > > > > > the 5th or the 100th. > > > > > > As long as the scope of the CFC is well-defined and well-bordered > > > don't worry about the number of functions in it. > > > > > > That being said I personally DO sometimes worry about > this. I tend to > > > > > possibly make multiple CFCs were multiple ones might not > be needed, > > > but are still logical. > > > > > > For example, I've got a CFC-based security system made up > of about a > > > dozen cooperating CFCs. The main "Security.cfc" contains > most of the > > > system-level stuff (the authentication caches, the instantiated > > > collections, etc). It has, I think, about 15 functions in it. > > > > > > However there are at least two sets of functions that may > have gone in > > > > > there... but didn't. One was installation and > deinstallation routines > > > > > for the system (which create database tables, Verity collections, > > > etc). These functions tended to be very long and only used once. > > > > > > So I created a "SecurityConfiguration.cfc" that JUST handles these > > tasks. > > > Some people don't like this idea (they think an > application should be > > > "self-contained) and that's a valid opinion. The point > is consistency > > > however: I set my boundaries for logical reasons and > maintained that > > > reasoning throughout the development of the system (and other > > systems). > > > > > > Essentially there has to be some systemic, logical reason for the > > splits. > > > Saying "there's too many functions" is NOT such a reason and you > > > should never (I think) consider splitting up a logically > consistent > > > CFC for that reason. > > > > > > Jim Davis > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:188013 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
