>>On 12/20/04 4:17 PM, Jim Davis wrote: >> >>> Is that what you're looking for? >> >>Yes, thanks for the hint! >>Your security framework is probably very good, but a bit >>too complex for >>my needs, I am trying to come up with an easier one for my >>requirements... >> >>Thanks.
> No problem. I'm working on documentation now, but it may > not appear until after new years. I know that it's a lot > to try and consume with no help tho' (I wrote it and as > I'm writing the docs I find myself digging for "why is > that like that" answers). > There's a lot of stuff in there that's just done for > extensibility (maybe as much as half the code covers this, > but isn't really needed for the actual functionality). > I hope once the docs are done it'll be more useful to > people in general. Yea, too bad it sucks. :P j/k sorry -- I couldn't resist. :) s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://macromedia.breezecentral.com/p49777853/ http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1 http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1 http://www.fusiontap.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta http://www.newatlanta.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:188342 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
