Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote: > Based on the comments - I ran a quick test with an SP which basically ran > the following (where iLanguageID and iEventID were @ variables passed in via > dbvarname):
How did you call the procedure, with cfquery or with cfstoredproc? Did you use <cfqueryparam>'s? That's actually what this part of the thread is about. I suggest you try ALL the possibilities. > > Now, this is by no means a solid call as it can fluctuate between them both > taking 0 duration but never the SP taking any more than that and shows its > more efficient. > That's not the point at all. We all know stored procedures are faster than plain vanilla sql statements. That's not in question, it's common sense. > Client vars do perform updates internally using SP's for EVERY CALL if you > do not switch that method off via the Client Vars section - maybe this is > what your DBA was seeing? This does indeed cause 3 SP's to run for every > .CFM thread; turn the updates off if you don't need last visit and hit count > updated constantly. Yes, I know that, problem is the app was relying on these variables. After disabling these updates, there was still overhead and inefficency on the DB storage for client vars. Run SQL Profiler on your database and you'll see it compiling and removing procedures all the time, not very good practice. -nathan strutz http://www.dopefly.com/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:188551 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
