Paul > pretty much everybody knows better than ms when it comes to JDBC & sql > server. ms's JDBC driver originally came from datadirect & hasn't really > progressed that far. and my own testing is exactly the opposite of your > findings, ms's JDBC driver was the 3rd slowest i tested: > > #1 jTDS http://jtds.sourceforge.net/ > #2 datadirect > #3 ms JDBC
As well as performance, other aspects to a DB driver are stability & functionality (like support for SQL syntax & the JDBC spec). Did you do any comparative testing of these aspects as well as performance, or do you know of any such testing that's been done? We're thinking of trying out jTDS but I'm wondering whether the speed comes at a price & if so, what the tradeoff is. I've read what they say about jTDS on sourceforge and of course it sounds great, but any kind of independent corroboration would be nice, particularly from people who've used it in a CF context. Nick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:191657 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
