I found CF 5 sandbox security difficult to manage, however that doesn't mean the user interaction couldn't be made more accessible without eliminating a very useful feature.
Something about baby and bathwater comes to mind. - Calvin -----Original Message----- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:51 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RDS Sandboxing on MX 7? That depends on who one is sandboxing from whom. A new instance means that: Admin changes that require a restart don't drop everyone's server; code that takes out the JVM or crashes CF only does it for one instance; CF Admin can be devolved to different people for each instance; RDS can be given to one group of people, exposing only the datasources in that instance, etc etc. The security model in CF5 did tie in with LDAP and other mechanisms - people found it too difficult to manage. -----Original Message----- From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 8 February 2005 7:43 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RDS Sandboxing on MX 7? Although that's a bit overkill! I wish RDS could integrate into user security (LDAP, database, etc.) in some fashion. - Calvin ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:193567 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
