Note that even if CFOUTPUT is horribly difficult to parse (which it isn't), it will only have effect on the first request to a given template, because of CF's compiler. Once it's compiled, then the number of tags present is utterly irrelevant, and only the number of dynamic expressions matters.
cheers, barneyb On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:35:06 -0500, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>One co-worked claimed he did it for performance he thought it would > > >>parse quiker, in CF5...I disagree. > > I desagree also, the difference is completely marginal. > The only difference it makes is that inside <CFOUTPUT, CF has to look for > chars > #, < " and ' while outside it only has to look for < " and ' > > But considering that using more CFOUTPUT increase considerabily the overall > number > of characters to parse, the effect can even be negative on the performance. > Any way, IMHO even if there is any difference, it would be so insignificant > taht it is not worth > the trouble: I tend to use as large CFOUTPUT areas as possible, in as less > number > as possible. > -- Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] 360.319.6145 http://www.barneyb.com/ Got Gmail? I have 50 invites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:194143 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
