I suspect Mike was trolling in his own forum... ;-) -----Original Message----- From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2005 7:26 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC?
I'm thinking that's over the top. The only crazy question is the one that's never asked. - Calvin -----Original Message----- From: Tyler Fitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC? Holy crap. That's an amazing thing to say. CFARGUMENT doesn't filter SQL Injection attacks. I can't see a single reason for such a case. That's crazy talk. t On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:26:10 -0400, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I see no reason for a CFQUERYPARAM being used inside a > CFC. It adds extra overhead and the protection that it provides should be provided instead by the CFARGUMENT tag. Does anyone see a reason for it in such a case? Data binding? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:194921 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
