Thanks James...

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:02:13 +0800, James Holmes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CFMX standard doesn't get involved in static content at all (i.e. anything
> not parsed as a CF file) so the location should make no difference.
> 
> The driver would be DataDirect v.(whatever shipped with 6.1), unless you
> replace it with jDTS or the MS driver.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Mische [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2005 10:59
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CFMX 6.1 Standard Questions
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I've recently changed jobs and have gone from working on CFMX 6.1 Enterprise
> (J2EE on JRun) with Oracle to CFMX 6.1 Standard with SQL Server 2000. I have
> a few questions relating to the differences in these environments. First,
> what database driver does CFMX standard use for SQL Server? Second, I know
> that in the J2EE config a significant performance increase may be seen by
> placing static content outside of the cfusion context root. Does this apply
> to the CFMX Standard as well?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any feedback.
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:196267
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to