Thanks James...
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:02:13 +0800, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CFMX standard doesn't get involved in static content at all (i.e. anything > not parsed as a CF file) so the location should make no difference. > > The driver would be DataDirect v.(whatever shipped with 6.1), unless you > replace it with jDTS or the MS driver. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Mische [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2005 10:59 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CFMX 6.1 Standard Questions > > Hello, > > I've recently changed jobs and have gone from working on CFMX 6.1 Enterprise > (J2EE on JRun) with Oracle to CFMX 6.1 Standard with SQL Server 2000. I have > a few questions relating to the differences in these environments. First, > what database driver does CFMX standard use for SQL Server? Second, I know > that in the J2EE config a significant performance increase may be seen by > placing static content outside of the cfusion context root. Does this apply > to the CFMX Standard as well? > > Thanks in advance for any feedback. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:196267 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54