> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > The ideal solution would be transparent to the application and 
> wouldn't put any undue restrictions on schema.
> 
> Which datatypes do you intend to use? CLOB / text or just small 
> varchar fields and integers? Stored procedures / DB side 
> programming? Any need for fulltext indexes?

[The following refers to MSSQL datatypes, etc., but keep in mind I'm still 
db-neutral.]

Since the architecture would probably only service our large surveys, I can be 
pretty sure that it will be 99% tinyint, int, bit, and varchar(256), and maybe 
1% textarea (varchar(4000)). However, sometimes, we have several textareas, and 
I get uncomfortable about the MSSQL 8k row limit, so I'll probably move 
textareas to "text" datatypes soon.

Also, the response table is generally very flat, with a column per data point 
(meaning many columns).

There are currently no sprocs, views, cursor, full text indexes, etc., 
servicing the surveys, it's all straight (simple) SQL at the moment.

When I first posed the question, I was hoping to get a solution that would 
service any of our apps, not just our surveys, but if we need/ought to 
specialize it for our surveys (which have the clustering requirements), then 
that's fine.

Thanks again for the questions and resplies,
Jamie

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:203037
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to