Thanks to all who have replied. I will take a look at the ColdFusion MX Coding Guidelines. Since I'm just looking for a better user experience, I'm going to need to play with caching ldap query results.
Thanks, - Charles On 5/13/05 1:50 PM, "Fabio Terracini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not anymore. Since MX version, cfscript and tag-based codes have the > same performance. > > You should make a Google search on "coldfusion performance". There are > several articles and blog posts on this subject and server performance. > You can also look at weblogs.macromedia.com. > > You might wanna look the ColdFusion MX Coding Guidelines that > Macromedia uses internally. This document is base for the one that comes > with ColdFusion 7. It's not complete, but covers most basic coding > performance issues. > > Also, let's say, using Compare() besides EQ ou NEQ *will not* drop you > time from 3000ms to 1000ms. Such improvements relays more on > archicteture and problem-solving approach than minimal coding improvements. > > -- > > Fabio Terracini > > > > Charles Heizer wrote: > >> Thanks, >> The concurrent traffic is not going to be more than 10 to 20 users at a >> time. >> >> Are there any good docs that cover writing more efficient code? I also >> remember somebody saying that cfscript doing a function if faster than using >> a cffunction tag. Is this true? >> >> Thanks, >> - Charles >> >> >> On 5/13/05 12:05 PM, "Sean Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:206696 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
