For that matter, actual browsers themseleves have some differences in implementation and rendering complex table layouts and CSS.
For the most part, the I think you'll find the HTML 4.01 and CSS 1 and 2 support is very good in CFDOCUMENT and far more complete than any other solution, IMO. HTH Damon >Hmmm, I would have to test this again but on early tests it doe not like >complex table layouts or advanced CSS. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 15 June 2005 00:00 >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: HTML to PDF > >Not sure what "complex HTML" is, but full HTML 4.01 and CSS 1 and 2 are >supported. If a browser can render it, we liely can as well. No >HTML->XHTML re-formatting is required. > > >>It is also not very good at complex HTML. >> >>Probably loads out there.....have a look for iText or some other Java based >>tool. >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:209706 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
