Adrocknaphobia wrote: > Jochem: I think the website is to blame for both parts. All sites > should be cross-browser compliant.
What is your definition of 'cross-browser compliant'? > All I was saying is from a 508 > standpoint it is a poor example, the fundamental objective of 508 is > to provide the same access to information, regardless of disability... > and regardless of thier browser choice. And that is exactly what that website is doing. Everybody gets the same access regardless of their browser choice: there is no browser sniffing and sending broken, incomplete or less functional pages to some browsers. > I know you don't want to hear > it, but the vast majority of users use IE, so common sense says code > to IE first, whether its standard compliant or not, then worry about > the other 5%. Common sense is to code for your requirements. And with any website that needs to comply with section 508 or 2000/78/EC that includes standard compliance. We wouldn't want to break the law, would we? Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:210072 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
