> -----Original Message----- > From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:04 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs) > > Jim: Any reason not to go with the prior art and just use (or extend, > if necessary) XML-RPC?
Mostly because I'd never heard of it until you mentioned it. Where have you been for the past two weeks while I've been ranting about not having something like this. ;^) > XML-RPC parsers are everywhere, so it's pretty much the no-brainer > default option for passing around programmatic data. In fact, that was It does look good - it's just odd that in my posting/searching I never came across it. While I've a bit too much invested in YODEL right now to stop I think I'll still add XML-RPC support (at least for the data format if not for the method calls) to my serialization libraries. Thanks! (Although I still wish you had spoken up two weeks ago. ;^) ) Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215798 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
