What I don't understand is why you don't use the compiler? If it's a speed issue, why not just have it output a SWF to the same dir and replace the generation code with the proper script to load the file?
These could be ported to full RIA's with Flashes loading capabilities quite easily than, instead of having to recreate the same forms (or steal them though outside means which just feels wrong...) Cheers, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Mike Nimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 30, 2005 10:36 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thinking? I just posted on Mark's blog, that yes as some of you guessed, we do perform a regex check against the Actionscript to check for illegal usage of Actionscript, instead of using the compiler. This is why we can't tell the difference between comments, strings, or Actionscript. I know this is a pain, and we have tried to document this as much as possible so you don't go banging your head against the wall. But you need to remember Flash forms are designed to replace static boring html forms, not to build custom RIA Applications. I know there is a fine line that does overlap sometimes. Honestly though if you're tweaking your forms so much that these keywords are becoming an issue. You might want to seriously look at Flex, it is a sweet tool. ---nimer ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:216806 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
