This is not always the case. Sometimes CFCs are placed in the application scope with state that changes all the time. The CFC could be a very busy manager, and not just a stateless utility or something. It might be in the application scope because you only want one, and no more.
On 9/2/05, Brian Kotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You only need to lock to prevent race conditions. Since > application-scoped CFCs should nearly always be stateless (they have > no instance data, or the instance data does not change once the > component is initialized), locking isn't an issue. > > On 9/2/05, Snake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about locking ? > > > > - > > snake > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 02 September 2005 14:59 > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: CFC's - Most efficient scope? > > > > Well we usually use > > > > <cfinvoke object="application.myCFC" method="myMethod" > > returnVariable="variables.myvar" argument1="value" argument2="some other > > value" /> > > > > Or the proper way to do it > > > > <cfinvoke object="application.myCFC" method="myMethod" > > returnvariable="variables.myvar"> > > <cfinvokeparam name="argument1" value="myvalue"> > > <cfinvokeparam name="argument2" value="some other value"> > > </cfinvoke> > > > > > > I think storing it in the application scope is the best place, since > then > > you can share it throughout your application. We do the same thing... we > > have all our db calls in different cfc's, and we keep them in > application > > scope. Since they're cached until the application is reset, they're very > > efficient. > > > > Russ > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andy Mcshane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 5:16 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: CFC's - Most efficient scope? > > > > Hi, been playing around with CFC's and fusebox4.1 for a bit, nothing too > > advanced. In the main part I use CFC's to do all of my database work, > they > > contain all of my calls to the database using stored procedures. My > question > > is what is the best amd most efficient way to execute them? At the > moment I > > initialize all of my CFC's into the application scope and then in my > fusebox > > model xml file use the following syntax; > > > > <invoke object="application.MyObject" > > methodcall="MyMethod( Arg1, Arg2, etc)" > > returnvariable="MyReturnVar"> > > > > OR > > > > <invoke object="application.MyObject" > > methodcall="MyMethod( argumentcollection=MyArgs )" > > returnvariable="MyReturnVar"> > > > > Is this an efficient way of doing this? Is there a better way to do it? > Have > > I completely misunderstood the use of CFC's? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:217259 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
