Nope.

Aaron Rouse wrote:
> Did they start the page off with:
>  <cfsetting enablecfoutputonly="yes">
>  I have worked on peoples code that always start with that and wrap things 
> like you described. Best I can tell they did it in an attempt to save on 
> white space.
> 
>  On 9/8/05, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> 
>>That makes sense. Although, I'm definitely inclined to think this
>>person had no idea of performance issues, since there are lines that
>>look like this:
>>
>><cfoutput>
>></td>
>></tr>
>></cfoutput>
>>
>>which is obviously just ridiculous, but they are EVERYWHERE. LOL. I
>>know I could get rid of those, just wondering if it would be easier to
>>just eliminate them all and surround the whole block (most are less than
>>100 lines) with one without sacrificing too much.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Andy McShane wrote:
>>
>>>I was always led to believe that putting cfoutput tags around a whole 
>>
>>block
>>
>>>of code was slower that only putting the tags around the code that you
>>>wanted output. If I remember correctly it is because the entire code 
>>
>>block
>>
>>>between cfoutput tags has to be parsed and that could mean wasting time 
>>
>>on a
>>
>>>lot of layout code. Not sure if there is a major difference in 
>>
>>performance,
>>
>>>suppose it depends on the amount of code in the block?
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: 08 September 2005 18:09
>>>To: CF-Talk
>>>Subject: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
>>>
>>>Hey all:
>>>
>>>I'm tasked with the job of reworking someone else's FB CF code, and one
>>>thing that is driving me crazy is that the person who originally wrote
>>>the code dropped in soooo many cfoutput's that it's really not readable.
>>>Is there a performance benefit for doing this vs just cfoutputting a
>>>whole block of code?
>>>
>>>Ray
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:217674
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to