Sure you would.  The former is exactly what I'd envision.  Just like
you a Vector (though without the Iterator).  The array would be
totally hidden inside the Vector CFC - the calling code would never
know there's an array in there (vs a linked list, or a backing DB
table).  Just the index-based accessors and mutators.

cheers,
barneyb

On 9/13/05, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about just an Array CFC that has an internal array
> > variable.
> > Since it's the CFC being passed, you get the
> > pass-by-reference.  You
> > could build whatever extra methods you wanted on it as
> > well as the
> > required accessor/modifier methods.  Basically you'd  be
> > rewriting
> > java.util.Vector with a CFC so that CF won't clone it all
> > over the
> > place like it does with real Vectors.
> 
> > cheers,
> > barneyb
> 
> That's possible... Not what I had in mind, but it's possible... It
> doesn't encapsulate the instructions the way I was imagining. Here's a
> crude example (pardon the lack of appropriate i18n, etc.):
> 
> <cfset item = session.cart.getHeadItem()>
> <cfloop condition="isObject(item)">
>         <tr>
>                 <td>#item.getName()#</td>
>                 <td>#item.getQty()#</td>
>                 <td>$#item.getPrice()#</td>
>                 <td>$#item.getSubtotal()#</td>
>         </tr>
>         <cfset item = item.getNextItem()>
> </cfloop>
> 
> comparable array version
> 
> <cfloop index="x" from="1" to="#arraylen(session.cart)#">
>         <cfset item = session.cart[x]>
>         <tr>
>                 <td>#item.getName()#</td>
>                 <td>#item.getQty()#</td>
>                 <td>$#item.getPrice()#</td>
>                 <td>$#item.getSubtotal()#</td>
>         </tr>
> </cfloop>
> 
> I'm not sure if this makes any sense, but I kinda like the
> encapsulation of the former -- it seems cleaner to me... Even if I
> wrapped the latter in a separate CFC to manage a java Vector I still
> wouldn't get that same kind of encapsulation.
> 
> 
> s. isaac dealey   954.522.6080
> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
> 
> add features without fixtures with
> the onTap open source framework
> 
> http://www.fusiontap.com
> http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm
> 
> 

-- 
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/

Got Gmail? I have 100 invites.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking 
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a 
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account.
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:218101
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to