>> -----Original Message----- >> From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:54 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Re: Detecting CFLOCK >> >> >> I don't usually write locks that are designed to throw >> errors... I >> generally write locks that are designed to wait for the >> previous lock >> to release, and so I think my memory of how exactly the >> timeout works
> I agree - I don't like to include exceptions as logic > gates unless you > really, really need to. > A slight variation on this that would eliminate the need > for the exception > is: Good call, Jim! :) I've just not worked with situations where I needed to use cflock on an optional process. At least not that I can recall... s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:218223 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
