CFSAVECONTENT is the fastest, since it doesn't have to make a bunch of intermediate strings to produce the final product, whereas CFSETs would...
-Dov -----Original Message----- From: Steve Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:53 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFSavecontent vs. multiple CFSets For me, cfsavecontent looks more natural. The result is easier to see and more visual space is given to the action performed than the language performing the action. Steve Steve Bryant. Bryant Web Consulting LLC http://www.BryantWebConsulting.com/ http://steve.coldfusionjournal.com/ > In running through a shopping cart codebase (cartweaver), I decided to > change a chunk of 40 or so CFSET operations into a single > CFSAVECONTENT block. As this was for building an XML packet, it looked > logical to me. No real savings in code size but to me it just looked > cleaner and looked like 'less' operations. > > Question: What is your preference in such situations. Multiple CFSETs > with each adding a new line of XML to the variable or a block of > CFSAVECONTENT with the entire block wrapped in a CFOUTPUT? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:220666 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
