Perhaps because his CF5 server is stable and doesn't fallover nearly as much
as CFMX.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 04 November 2005 15:03
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [SPAM : 8.1] Re: Rumors from Max..

If you can't see a reason to move to MX from 5, then you may be hoplessly
lost.

-Adam

On 11/3/05, Terry Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are basically a scripter why would you think a move to java is 
> A good thing, especially with all the problems it seems come up with 
> The java odbc conectivity issues and the ms breaking my java setup.
> I love CF5 and just am reluctant to go to 6.1 or 7. C'mon guys 
> convince me.
>
> Terry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:13 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: [SPAM : 8.1] Re: Rumors from Max..
>
> > Why exactly was CFMX6 needed to save the product from CF5,
> if that's
> > what you meant?
> > Just curious as I am still in love with 5.0
> >
> > Terry Troxel
>
> I think he's referring to the move to Java.
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:223194
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to