On 11/19/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fusebox 4 was developed specifically for CFMX, and doesn't use OO or > CFCs. Just because it don't have the buzzword compliance doesn't make > a framework bad. Heck, FB3 which was designed for CF4 is still a very > viable framework. Which isn't to say you should pick up a new > framework (or three), of course.
I was very public about my dislike for FB3 but FB4 began to persuade me and FB41 is very compelling in my opinion. Don't discounted FB41 based on bad experiences with FB3... > Bottom line, I don't think there's a way out except to pick a set of > alternatives, give each one a try, and see which one you like best. In an ideal world, that's good advice. Besides, knowing more than one framework is good for your resume... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Got frameworks? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:224743 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
