On 11/23/05, Jeff Chastain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This was my thought as well. Basically, the worst that would happen is that > a user might have to log in again if the server they were 'stuck' to went > down and they were shifted to a different server. In some applications this > could be a problem, but I expect it would not be for most. Is this correct?
If the session data was really important (a purchase), then you've lost the work done during the last request (entering payment information) *and* made the user much less confident in your site. Of course a simpler solution than session-clustering to this problem is to not require sessions for the purchase process :) -- John Paul Ashenfelter CTO/Transitionpoint (blog) http://www.ashenfelter.com (email) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:225248 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
