I would not replace the (2) as well, since it is only searching for the
pattern "(" [0-9]+ ")". For the (2) to be included it would have to accept
spaces (between the two sets) and open/close parens within the matching
patter (currently only accepts [0-9])........................ Ben Nadel Web Developer Nylon Technology 6 West 14th Street New York, NY 10011 212.691.1134 212.691.3477 fax www.nylontechnology.com "Vote for Pedro" -----Original Message----- From: Benjamin Paige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 11:31 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Regex problem. Wouldn't that replace the "(2)" as well? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:226449 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
