> >Actually it turns me off for specifically because it does use this
> >old
> > > outmoded monolithic view of the things. I prefer a more
> > encapsulated object-based way of coding.
>
> I'd be quite interested to hear how you are doing this. If you had
> time to post a few, even nonworking samples, that would be great too.
> Many of us are always looking for new, better ways to do things. I'd
> be interested in how you are achieving an object oriented structure
> (though I have looked at cfobjects.com, I presume you are doing
> something different)...
Before I respond to that perhaps I should revisit fusebox.org and refresh
myself on who's behind it. :)
In short I simply meant encapsulating each major functional unit, generally
in it's own folder. Last time I read up on fusebox it had a monolithic
aproach to things (one big functional block). Maybe it's changed though.
(Reminds me a bit of a rack mount in some ways.)
I prefer to split things up into logical functional units (forums, products,
etc) with a well known entry/exit points and interface states. BUT calling
on css's (and header/footer cfms) from thier parent folders to maintain a
constant look and feel.
That's all I meant. More organic. Less mechanical. :)
--min
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
