The one you read about ran on maybe 2-4 pcs. I had to slow the latest one down (still macros) because it was more or less a DoS at full speed. That said, explain to me how you could get CF to go faster without killing the server on the receiving end?
Doesn't much matter how many threads you have going if the connection on the other end can only handle so much. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -----Original Message----- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Debugging & CSS Layout I know that CF would be faster then some crappy macro language running on top of IIS. And even if by some magic it wasn't, there is an implementation somewhere that lets you have multiple threads on a CF page. If I was really worried about performance, I'd just code something up in java with multiple threads that would do the job a lot faster. I doubt that the web server would have trouble keeping up with me, and if it did, I can always throttle back on the # of threads. And I never said he was smart... just maybe smart enough from previous experiences to start logging ips as well... if not, he should be doing it from now on... if he doesn't he's an idiot. So I'd be glad to challenge you if you want, but I assume everyone would agree with me that CFHTTP is faster then some crappy macro language, and that CF with multiple threads beats any macro language hands down. Russ > -----Original Message----- > From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:55 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF Debugging & CSS Layout > > I'd be glad to challenge you to submit as many entries as fast as I did > with > that method. Not only do you have to worry about tying up your web server, > you'd have to worry about theirs keeping up. > > Ps... if he was smart he'd get a damn job. Besides... multiple IPs were > used > :) > > ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. > Bobby Hartsfield > http://acoderslife.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:19 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF Debugging & CSS Layout > > Hey Bobby, just checked out your site and read the "Gone phishing" > entry... > Just wondering why you didn't just use cfhttp and used MacroExpress > instead? > CFHTTP would be a lot faster, and more efficient, and not require you to > have 3 computer running just to post some data to some scammer's form. > And > if he's smart at all, he's collection source ip addresses and can trash > the > data. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 4:38 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: CF Debugging & CSS Layout > > > > > Bobby and I got a good laugh at that > > > > I have no clue what you're talking about. Where does he even have a css > > menu? The only one I recall laughing at lately was yours lol. I'm not > > having > > a 3-way with you 2... stop trying. > > > > ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. > > Bobby Hartsfield > > http://acoderslife.com > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 2:49 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CF Debugging & CSS Layout > > > > Will you need to put a hat on your balding head cause because the chill > > must > > be doing more damage. > > > > Yes there was an issue but since in your old age and receding hair line > > and > > memory seem to forget that the problem was a z-index bug in mac ff which > > isn't a fault of css. > > Crying? Will should I post your 28,459 yahoo im's a day i get from you > > where > > your stolen code don't work and you can't understand why.... > > > > " Yanno why? Because they just aren't quite THERE yet." > > Umm ok Mr Expert who when asked didn't even know how to make a css > comment > > a > > few days ago so how are you qualified to make this assuming? The fact is > > css > > is fine and the part that's not in the building yet is you. > > > > After I hit community mx? Ok Will, I seem to recall you freaking out > like > > you won the lottery (again) about how your css menu WORKED OMG YOU CANT > > BELIEVE IT WORKED FIRST TIME OMG OMG and it was you who copied and > pasted > > their menu into your page, you couldn't even change the colors lol, > Bobby > > and I got a good laugh at that and all your OMG OMG OMG IT WORKED FIRST > > TIMES, which is the only clue we need to know you didn't write it . > > > > " but I'd rather avoid that and drop in a few tables that WORK IN ALL MY > > BROWSERS with no hassle" > > Ok Will, even when you do that they don't work till you spend 3 weeks > > making > > each row color and this is how you are and half-ass everything, maybe if > > you > > took the time to learn some of this stuff (instead of working on > > i_will_never_be_done_with_this_friggin_cart.cfc) instead of half assin > > everything then you'd have more than one (1) client and some of your own > > knowledge. Oh and I like how you say "all my browsers" lol, now there is > > something to look for in a web developer, well hell it looks good in all > > HIS > > browsers!!! Well they don't look good in MY browsers and I'm the > visitor, > > do > > you get the difference? > > > > If you don't understand it that's fine but don't blame it on css blame > it > > on > > yourself, you can look at the csszengardens.com and they look better and > > more consistent than any of your table based layouts so they must be > using > > that ulta-secret magic>css tag > > > > > > "with no hassle" > > Do you tell potential clients this? Maybe that's why they don't call you > > back.... > > Again this is you half-assing it, I can see you telling your clients > that > > you will only do the minimum to get by but it will look good on YOUR > > browser.... > > This isn't a job to half-ass it, sometimes you need to actually spend > > sometime doing what's needs to give them a quality site. And so when you > > make these sites, well ok your one site, and the day comes that they > want > > visitors to be able to view it on their Ipod (since i bet the next ipod > > will > > have Internet on it) and now they are going to have to remake their site > > and > > since you half-assed it the first time do you think they are going to > come > > back to you again? > > > > And since you try to "mock" what I do then how come everything you do I > > can > > look at source and see my(yes mine but poorly hacked) code? > > > > ~Dave the disruptor~ > > google will pay you money to getting rid of ie :) > > http://explorerdestroyer.com/ > > http://www.killbillsbrowser.com/ > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: Will Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 7:27 AM > > To: CF-Talk <cf-talk@houseoffusion.com> > > Subject: Re: CF Debugging & CSS Layout > > > > > heck the last 2 sites i did looked perfect in mac ie without any > > > tweaks at all, I don't know how you'd know since you don't have a mac. > > > > No, I don't remember you whining like a little baby cause your css > > wouldn't > > work right. You said oh I got it! Still broke! Menus, layout, > everything. > > Don't be lyin' either, like you never cried about it. > > > > Bottom line is css layouts tortured you disruptor! Admit it! They made > you > > pull your hair out quite a few times. Gave you a headache. Yanno why? > > Because they just aren't quite THERE yet. Alllllmost but not yet. yeah > you > > got yours workin finally after bobby held yer hand, and after you hit > > communitymx all night long readin' tutorials, but I'd rather avoid that > > and > > drop in a few tables that WORK IN ALL MY BROWSERS with no hassle. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:229654 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
