Thanks guys, Why is it frowned upon by the way? I've heard such talk before, that's why I ask, but I'm not sure of the reasons.
Baz -----Original Message----- From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 5:41 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: SERVER scope If as you say this library is "server wide" then I say go for it :) But make sure and check to see if it already exists and only instantiate it once - othewise whats' the point? -mark -----Original Message----- From: Baz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2006 4:25 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: SERVER scope Hi, I have a CFC that I use across all applications. It's basically a global UDF library that stores no data. Is it ok to store this CFC in the SERVER scope rather than the application scope? Is using a named lock for this ok: <cflock name="ServerUtils" type="exclusive"> <cfset Server.Utils=createObject('Component','SystemUtils') /> </cflock> Cheers, Baz ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:232884 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
