I haven't tried CFAJAX, so I don't know the answer to your question. But may be you might want to have a look at : JSMX (http://www.lalabird.com/) (or is it too late for you to consider another API) ?? I found it much easier to set up and use than ajaxCFC. May be it is just my preference.
Regards, Pine -----Original Message----- From: Nick Han [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 10:56 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: cfajax vs ajaxCFC Question. I have used both of these APIs in my test environment. I think they both work well. There are pros and cons in choosing one over the other, and most of these issues I encountered were minor. For instance, ajaxCFC is easier to set up, but the thing I don't like about it is the passed parameters are transformed and received as array arguments by the CFCs. As for CFAJAX it is more work to set up, I like the fact that arguments are received by functions the way there have been passed by the calling page. So you keep variable naming in tact for self-documenting and easy debugging. Also with CFAJAX you can't use it within CFC framework. So there's a mixed bag of good and bad between the two. I am about to pick one of these APIs and use it in my production environment and I want to hear your opinions from those of you who have used it extensively. I would like to hear your advice on what to watch out for under each and which one would you recommend if you have worked with both. Thanks. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:234894 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
